Cases 21 - 30 of 66
McRant v. Ford et al
as 6:2017cv01829
Plaintiff:
Jovan McRant
Defendant:
Deangelo Ford, Sgt Will, Michael Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. The Secretary of Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jovan Watkins
Defendant:
The Secretary of Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and MCI-J D.O.C. Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Gray v. Terence McAuliffe
as 17-1
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY JOVAN GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERENCE R. MCAULIFFE, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, EDDIE PEARSON, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center and others
Gray v. McAuliffe et al
as 3:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jovan Gray
Defendant:
Terence Richard McAuliffe , Harold W. Clarke , Eddie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. USA
as 4:2016cv03282
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jovan Cornelius Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walker et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02939
Plaintiff:
David Walker and Jovan Walker
Defendant:
NationStar Mortgage LLC , US Bank National Association , Buonassissi Henning and Lash, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Thomas Porter v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS ALEXANDER PORTER, ANTHONY BERNARD JUNIPER, MARK LAWLOR and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN TELEGUZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and DAVID ZOOK
US v. Jovan McLaughlin
as 16-4405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOVAN MARQUELL MCLAUGHLIN
McLaughlin v. USA
as 3:2016cv00534
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jovan Marquell McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ali v. Whitmore et al
as 1:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
Jovan Ali
Defendant:
Sean Whitmore, P. Miller, Ms. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
