Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Norton v. Columbus County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Harold Fipps, Jerome McMillian, Columbus County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Interested Party:
Stella Anderson, Bob Cordle, David Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Marion Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Mission McDowell Hospital, Marion Police Department, Marion Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Sue Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Columbus County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Harold Fipps, Leslie Macrae Doless, Jr., Jerome McMillian and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018ct03257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights North Carolina v. McDowell County Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00195
Defendant:
McDowell County Board of Education and Glenda Starr
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belfield v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018ct03103
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rashawn Belfield
Defendant:
T. Johnson, Officer Hinton, Officer Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell County v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00100
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
McDowell County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
McDowell v. USA
as 3:2016cv00572
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Broderick Maurice McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
