Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Rochester v. Toth et al
as 6:2018cv01979
Respondent:
Unknown Richland Co Ct HO, NFN Hall, Ms Toth and others
Petitioner:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Clary v. Sergeant Harper
as 16-7047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH SHANE CLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT HARPER
Defendant:
DARLENE WHITE, SHEILA MOORE, MS. HARRIS and others
Rochester v. Satans Kidnappers and Aiders et al
as 6:2015cv04966
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Satans Kidnappers and Aiders, Ms Harris, Mr Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Clary v. Darlene White
as 15-6479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH SHANE CLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
DARLENE WHITE, SHEILA MOORE, MS. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT HARPER, ROBERT C. LEWIS, CYNTHIA MUNDY and others
Clary v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03204
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Clary
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Darlene White, Cynthia Mundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Corpening v. Tracey John
as 12-7465
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING
Respondent - Appellee:
TRACY JOHNS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MS. HARRIS, D. DENSON and others
Warren v. Prince William County et al
as 1:2011cv00832
Plaintiff:
James A. Warren
Defendant:
Prince William County, Superintendent Major Meltis, Lt. Cujoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lassiter v. John et al
as 5:2011hc02078
Petitioner:
Steve J. Lassiter
Respondent:
Tracy John, Ms. Harris, Ms. Hayward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Corpening v. Johns et al
as 5:2011hc02057
Petitioner:
Michael C. Corpening
Respondent:
Tracey Johns, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ms. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
