Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Michael Scott v. Watsontown Trucking Co. Inc.
as 13-1228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
WATSONTOWN TRUCKING CO. INC. and WILLIAM A. MILLER, III
Lewis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00881
Plaintiff:
Rene Lewis and Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Michael Corpening
as 12-6915
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie
US v. Michael Smith, Jr.
as 12-6538
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS SMITH, JR.
Scott v. Watsontown Trucking Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Scott
Defendant:
Watsontown Trucking Co. Inc. and William A. Miller, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lefttridge v. Matthews et al
as 1:2011cv03499
Plaintiff:
Vernon J. Leftridge
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Kelly Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02510
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dickson v. Parker Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Parker, All John/Jane Does at Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Ralph Albaseau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Moore v. Director Jon Ozmint
as 09-7400
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEWIS MOORE, a/k/a Michael L. Moore
Respondent - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, South Carolina Department of Corrections and MCKITHER BODISON, Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
White v. Greenwood et al
as 5:2009ct03123
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis White
Defendant:
B.D. Greenwood and Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
