Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Burgess v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Thugarella Burgess
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Nsekenene Kolongo, M.D., Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority ("HRRJA") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Howell v. NCCU
as 17-1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, DEBRA SAUNDERS-WHITE, GREG MARROW and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROGER DANIELS, HARRY MONDS and others
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11205
Plaintiff:
Jo N. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv00576
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOWELL
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY , BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA , DEBRA SAUNDERS-WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Smith v. McMaster et al
as 3:2015cv02177
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson
as 14-1499
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
LINWOOD WILSON
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
Christopher Lytes v. Christian Smith
as 14-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LYTES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTIAN SMITH, DAVID WOOD, BRIAN N. SMITH and others
Samuel Smith v. Jean Toal
as 14-1280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL N. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN H. TOAL, RICK QUINN, T. STEPHEN LYNCH and others
Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jean Smith and Jessie N Smith
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Toal et al
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Smith
Defendant:
Jean H Toal, Rick Quinn, T Stephen Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
