Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Chesapeake Bank v. Berger et al
as 1:2014mc00516
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stuart D. Berger, Deborah D. Berger, Berger Properties of Ohio, LLC and others
Receiver:
Keith M. Northern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Lisa L. Owen, et al. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., et al.
as 2:2014cv23980
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Owen and Darren S. Owen
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., L'Oreal USA Creative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chesapeake Bank v. Berger et al
as 4:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stuart D. Berger , Deborah D. Berger , Berger Properties of Ohio, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.D.R. v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-2244
Petitioner:
S. D. R.
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Walker v. Barry et al
as 1:2013cv01234
Plaintiff:
Godfrey Walker
Defendant:
Stan Barry and S. D. Delach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kane Builders S&D, Inc. v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC
as 8:2012cv03775
Plaintiff:
Kane Builders S&D, Inc.
Defendant:
Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Intercoastal Contracting, Inc et al
as 7:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Intercoastal Contracting Company, Inc., D & S Enterprises, LLC, S & D Enterprises of Wilmington, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S. D., et al. v. Starr et al
as 8:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
S. D. , Jason Diaz and Amy Diaz
Defendant:
Joshua P. Starr and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belfield v. Rankin
as 1:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Karl Thomas Belfield
Defendant:
S. D. Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.E.D. et al v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
J. E. D., J. D. and S. D.
Defendant:
Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
