Cases 31 - 40 of 64
ELMORE v. SAUNDERS et al
as 1:2013cv00515
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIOUS E. ELMORE
Defendant:
SORRELL SAUNDERS, KRISTIE B. STANBACK, C. L. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Western Surety Company v. National Roofing Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Western Surety Company
Defendant:
National Roofing Co., Inc., C&L Investment Properties, Inc. and Louis T. Crispino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Clagon v. High
as 4:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Latoria M Clagon
Defendant:
C L High
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clagon v. High
as 2:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Latoria M Clagon
Defendant:
C L High
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Grady et al
as 7:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Virginius R Phipps
Defendant:
Benjamin L. Grady, Dale Faircloth, Stratton F. Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Calhoun-El v. Stouffer et al
as 1:2012cv03390
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-El
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, Randall Watson, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Calhoun-El v. Marsh
as 12-7950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. CALHOUN-EL
Appellee:
SERGEANTD MARSH
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner, RANDALL WATSON, Administrative Commissioner, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden and others
Calhoun-El v. Stouffer et al
as 1:2012cv02479
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-El
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, Randall Watson, Bobby P. Shearin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Vargas et al
as 1:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
Santee Joseph Blair
Defendant:
K Vargas, J. Gibbs, T. Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
