Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backus et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 3:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Vandroth Backus , Willie Harrison Brown , Charlesann Buttone and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The , Nimrata Nikki R Haley , Ken Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Backus et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Vandroth Backus , Willie Harrison Brown , Charlesann Buttone and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The , Nimrata Nikki R Haley , Ken Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Clemmon Woodard v. Sheriff Donnie Harrison
as 11-6626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEMMON AUGUSTA WOODARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff and MEDICAL STAFF OF WAKE COUNTY JAIL
Clemmons v. Bayer CropScience, Inc., et al
as 4:2011cv03294
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc.,, 3M Business Product Sales, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Walt Clemmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clemmons v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Shajuana Clemmons
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Clemmons' Estate v. Lamberth
as 1:2009mc00026
Plaintiff:
Clemmons' Estate
Defendant:
Royce C. Lamberth
Woodard v. Harrison et al
as 5:2008cv00624
Plaintiff:
Clemmon Augusta Woodard
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison and Medical Staff of Wake County Jail
Cause Of Action: Local Question
Woodard v. Harrison et al
as 5:2008ct03177
Plaintiff:
Clemmon Augusta Woodard
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison and Medical Staff of Wake County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clemmons v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clemmons
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
