Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Roberts et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08588
Plaintiff: Hazel Mae Roberts and David Earl Roberts, Sr.
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Peritt et al
as 5:2012hc02234
Petitioner: David Earl Jones
Respondent: Bradley Peritt and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. David William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4719
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID EARL WILLIAMS, a/k/a Kristian Williams
Smith v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00135
Plaintiff: David Earl Smith
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burgess v. Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2011cv02384
Plaintiff: David Earl Burgess
Defendant: Jason Hall and Lt B Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. David Watt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4282
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID EARL WATTS, a/k/a High Gear, a/k/a Driver
US v. David Moore, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-4641
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID EARLE MOORE, JR.
Scott v. Brown, et al
as 5:2009ct03106
Plaintiff: David Earl Scott and David Earl Scott
Defendant: Robert Brown, Ben Harris, Bobby Ray Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott
as 4:2009cv00111
Plaintiff: David Earl Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2009cv01038
Plaintiff: David Earl Webb and Linda Webb
Defendant: Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?