Cases 31 - 40 of 3,425
Rice v. Meritus Medical Center et al
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Dariush A. Rice
Defendant:
Meritus Medical Center, Maulik Joshi, Dr. Joshua's T. Mclain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Bayne v. CG Cosmetic Dental LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02346
Defendant:
Camila Guiribitey, Juan C. Izquierdo, CG Cosmetic Dental LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Laura J. Bayne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
William C. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DeiuLio v. Baydu
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Adam M. DeiuLio
Defendant:
Dr. Baydu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Slonaker et al
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Katlynn Slonaker, Caroline Helsley, Amber Dopkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Mims et al
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Mr Mims, Ms. Butler, Staci Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
