Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Pearson v. Ammons et al
as 5:2015ct03267
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Pearson
Defendant:
James F. Ammons, Jr., Peter Strickland and Harnett County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortez v. Medical Administrator at Central Prison et al
as 5:2015ct03251
Plaintiff:
Antonio Medramo Ortez
Defendant:
Medical Administrator at Central Prison, Medical Administrator at Harnett Prison, Medical Administrator at Caledonia Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamm v. Scaturo et al
as 9:2015cv02734
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
Holly Scaturo , Dr Gothard , NFN Chuma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hospira Worldwide, Inc. v. Harnett Health Systems, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00189
Defendant:
Harnett Health System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hospira Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00893
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Charles Williams v. Josh Christenson
as 14-7711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSH CHRISTENSON, Harnett County Sheriff's Office, WILLIAM COATS, Angier Police Department, ADAM DUNN, Johnston County Sheriff's Office and others
Harnett v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv19703
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harnett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobert Redmon v. Carlton Joyner
as 14-6407
Petitioner - Appellant:
HOBERT GREGORY REDMON
Respondent - Appellee:
CARLTON B. JOYNER, Administrator, Harnett Correctional institution
Ronnie Penley v. Cynthia Thornton
as 14-6311
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNIE NEIL PENLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CYNTHIA THORNTON, Administrator, Harnett Correctional Institution
Ellis v. Umesi et al
as 5:2014ct03064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dane Ellis
Defendant:
Dr. Umesi and Harnett Correctional Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
