Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Martin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv02690
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Martin and Vincent M. Martin
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08375
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Martin and Larry Martin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02775
Plaintiff:
Lori M. Martin and Robert E. Martin
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. M.V.L.E., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Martin
Defendant:
M.V.L.E., Inc. and Todd Sides
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Estes et al v. McDonald's Restaurants of West Virginia, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Richard Estes , Gary M. Martin, Sr. and Jeremy Thompson
Defendant:
McDonald's Restaurants of West Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
LINDSAY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2011cv00067
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, S. PATTERSON, M. MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JAVON LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDSAY v. LEWIS
as 1:2011cv00014
Petitioner:
DERRICK JAVON LINDSAY
Respondent:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, S. PATTERSON, M. MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00088
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Tracey M. Martin
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pinson v. Martin
as 8:2009cv02131
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
M Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pinson v. Martin
as 8:2009cv02045
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
M Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
