Cases 31 - 40 of 1,516
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Cottongim et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00401
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cottongim, Kyle Allen Cadwallader, Keith Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Deangelo Joyner
as 24-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEANGELO MAURICE JOYNER
CUMMINGS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
XAVIER MAURICE CUMMINGS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moore v. D.O.C. et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Marvin Maurice Moore
Defendant:
D.O.C., PSCC, LVCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SGT. ROUSE
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NEUSE CORRECTIONAL INST. and SGT. ROUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Handy et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tinika SeCal Warren and Tinika Se'Cal Warren
Defendant:
Maurice Handy, Regina Montgromery, Lynn Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. USA
as 8:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Maurice Mills
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kelly et al v. Groupe
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
Latesha Kelly and maurice kelly
Defendant:
Lisa timbillah and Riegel Groupe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
