Cases 31 - 40 of 51
In re: Robert A. Neilsen and Amanda Barker
as 5:2012mc00022
Interested Party:
Charles R. Allen, Bankruptcy-Harrisonburg and U.S. Attorney Timothy J. Heaphy
Debtor:
Amanda Barker and Robert A. Neilsen
Bennie Mitchell v. Desiree Allen
as 12-6491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE DARREN MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DESIREE R. ALLEN, Court Reporter Manager, South Carolina Court Administration and JOY E. HOLSTON, Court Reporter, Official Court Reporter 8th Judicial Circuit
Mitchell v. Allen et al
as 8:2011cv03361
Plaintiff:
Bennie Darren Mitchell
Defendant:
Desiree R Allen and Joy E Holston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irby v. Allen
as 8:2011cv02021
Plaintiff:
James R. Irby, III
Defendant:
James R. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Allen
as 1:2011cv00657
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Paul R. Allen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Enderle v. Allen, et al
as 1:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Enderle
Defendant:
Edward R. Allen and Suzanne Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Allen et al
as 5:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Allen, Mary Lou Allen, Charles T. Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, LTD et al
as 5:2010mc00027
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Stanford International Bank, LTD, Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management, LLC and others
Receiver:
Ralph S. Janvey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reynolds v. City of Roanoke
as 7:2010mc00034
Trustee:
Charles R. Allen, Jr.
Interested Party:
Bankruptcy-Roanoke
Defendant:
City of Roanoke
Debtor:
Ern Reynolds
Plaintiff:
Ern Reynolds
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
