Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Tashawn Thorne v. Officer Wesley
as 17-7039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAWN QWANTREAL THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WESLEY, Piedmont Correctional Officer, OFFICER SHERWIN, Piedmont Regional Jail, OFFICER BOOKER, Piedmont Regional Jail Officer and others
Defendant:
MS. BOWEN, Mental Health, MS. L. SMITH, Medical Nurse, MRS. SERGEANT TISDALE, Grievance Coordinator and others
Jones v. Lane
as 2:2017cv02128
Petitioner:
Alwin T Jones
Respondent:
Gary Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Crews v. Trent et al
as 1:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Crews
Defendant:
Timothy Trent, R. Espinoza and T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig William Brown v. G. Holloway
as 16-7617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG WILLIAM BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
G. HOLLOWAY, T. JONES, E. COLLINS and others
Jones v. Basford et al
as 2:2016cv03212
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard C. Basford, II and The Charleston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Lumber Liquidators Inc
as 1:2016cv02774
Plaintiff:
Kathy T Jones and Dora D Hall
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jorge Gevara v. F. Hubbard
as 15-7523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE GEVARA
Defendant - Appellee:
F. B. HUBBARD, Superintendent, CRUTCHFIELD, Assist. Superintendent of Programs, DEBRA DUNCAN, R.N. - Medical Administrator and others
Jeffrey Coleman v. John Jabe
as 15-6975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN JABE, ROBERT BIVENS, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Defendant:
T. JONES, STANLEY YOUNG, K. S. RICHARDSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
