Cases 31 - 40 of 381
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lester v. Nemo et al
as 7:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cody Lester
Defendant:
Penny Nemo, Jim Shortt, Katy Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ragland v. Vance County et al
as 5:2022ct03409
Plaintiff:
Kim Ragland and Kenneth Watkins
Defendant:
Vance County, City of Henderson, W.E. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Caila Vance
as 22-4558
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAILA VANCE
David Vance v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 22-2041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID VANCE, ROXIE VANCE and CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
David Vance v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 22-1958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID VANCE, ROXIE VANCE and CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
DIRECTV, LLC v. David Vance
as 22-250
Petitioner:
DIRECTV, LLC
Respondent:
DAVID VANCE, ROXY VANCE, CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated and others
Coletti v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv02580
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Vance Coletti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frith v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Rodney Vance Frith
Defendant:
Harold Walter Clarke, Kyle and Dr. Kyle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
