Cases 41 - 50 of 2,103
ANDERSON v. NOVANT HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUS LAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, DAVIE COUNTY, DAVIE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT DETENTION CENTER, JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Law v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Justin Law
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boehm v. Law
as 2:2023cv07094
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Boehm
Defendant:
Brando Elijah Law
Other:
State Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Tai Lawe v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07120
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tai Lawe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Muhidin Omar v. John Gardner
as 23-7300
Plaintiff:
MUHIDIN SALAD OMAR
Defendant:
JOHN CHRISTIAN GARDNER, Attorney at Law
Jeriton Curry v. Max Cogburn
as 23-7302
Plaintiff:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant:
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., United States District Judge, DAVID CAYER, United States Magistrate Judge, DAVID C. KEESLER, United States Magistrate Judge and others
DANIELS v. COMPU-LINK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Defendant:
BLOOM RETIREMENT HOLDINGS INC., COMPU-LINK CORPORATION doing business as CELINK, CARYN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lewis et al v. Johnson Hall et al
as 8:2023cv03419
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Hon Lisa A. Johnson Hall, Hon, Dolores Dorsainvil and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Lewis and Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunction against Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
