Cases 41 - 50 of 2,162
Robbie Plyler v. Russell Cox
as 24-1488
Defendant:
COX BROTHERS, INC., d/b/a Cox Brothers Farm, CAMPBELL COX, RUSSELL F. COX and others
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE G. PLYLER and DEBORAH PLYLER
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc v. Pender et al
as 3:2024cv03245
Defendant:
Trey, Abercrombie Insurance Services, Linda Pender and others
Plaintiff:
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robbie Plyler v. Russell Cox
as 24-1445
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE G. PLYLER and DEBORAH PLYLER
Defendant:
RUSSELL F. COX, COX LAND INVESTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, COX FARM MANAGEMENT, LLC, d/b/a Cox Brothers Farm and others
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Michael Russell, State of North Carolina, Snappers Grill & Steam Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Jeff Kinkaid, William Kelly, Ken Kingman and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walters v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2024cv00319
Defendant:
Medical Staff and Security Staff
Plaintiff:
Russell Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Russell Vane, IV
as 24-4257
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUSSELL RICHARDSON VANE, IV, a/k/a Duke Russ Hampel, a/k/a Duke
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00401
Petitioner:
RUSSELL EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
