Cases 41 - 50 of 753
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alloway, James Richard Allen, Charles Anderson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Chapman v. USA
as 5:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Michael Jarrell Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chapman v. Sam's East Inc et al
as 4:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Candyce Chapman
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc doing business as Sam's Club and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Chapman v. USA
as 3:2024cv00376
Petitioner:
Ishmeel Qyshawn Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chapman v. Mnuchin
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Josh Chapman
Respondent:
Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Charles v. Chapman
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner:
Lawrence Charles
Respondent:
Michael Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sandra Wilder-Rhodan v. Nancy McLin
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WILDER-RHODAN, Beneficiary of Estate of George M. Rhodan
Defendant:
JUDGE NANCY CHAPMAN MCLIN, State of South Carolina, Family Court, J. GRAHAM STURGIS, JR., Attorney, VERONICA SMALLS, Attorney and others
Cunningham v. Loudoun County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Colette Cunningham
Defendant:
Loudoun County Sheriff's Office and Michael L. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
CHAPMAN v. TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.