Cases 41 - 50 of 435
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zion Williamson v. Prime Sports Marketing, LLC
as 22-1946
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZION WILLIAMSON
Defendant / Appellant:
PRIME SPORTS MARKETING, LLC and GINA FORD
Zion Williamson v. Prime Sports Marketing, LLC
as 22-1793
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZION WILLIAMSON
Defendant / Appellant:
PRIME SPORTS MARKETING, LLC and GINA FORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keith et al v. Chesney
as 2:2022cv02248
Petitioner:
J Mark Keith and Gina Davis Keith
Respondent:
Sheila M Chesney
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Erin Gaffney, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Testa v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Gina Testa
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Neil v. Cartiva, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gina Neil
Defendant:
Cartiva, Inc., Wright Medical Group, N.V. and Stryker B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Alston et al v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alston, Marcus Ragsdale, Trillane Hill and others
Defendant:
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, Exelon Corporation, Exelon Business Services Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
