Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03742
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grooms v. Gillispie
as 3:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Grooms
Defendant:
Emily Gillispie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Groom, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 7:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Michael Groom , City of Jacksonville, N.C. , Christopher Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Groom et al v. Bombardier Transportation Services et al
as 1:2016cv02624
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Groom and Adam J. Quigley
Defendant:
Bombardier Transportation Services and Ronald Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Groom et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04550
Plaintiff:
Judith Groom and Russell Groom
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grooms v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
Shandra Grooms
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linda Grooms v. Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-1148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA GROOMS, Administratrix of the Estate of John Grooms, Sr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTER HOLMES MCGUIRE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER, HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA/JOHN RANDOLPH MEDICAL CENTER and VAN GO, INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.