Cases 41 - 50 of 3,844
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Samuel Whatley, II v. City of North Charleston
as 24-1559
Plaintiff:
REV. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II and PACITA D. WHATLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY, Mayor at CND and others
Samuel Whatley, II v. Bethany Phillips
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
BETHANY PHILLIPS, General Manager, U-HAUL, AMERCO and others
Royal II v. Greene, et al.
as 1:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Royal II
Defendant:
Central Maryland Correctional Facility and David Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carraway v. Fields et al
as 5:2024ct03153
Defendant:
Officer Griffin, Sgt. McCoy, Officer J. Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Carraway, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00278
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Neal, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lorence Smith, II v. Warden
as 24-6552
Petitioner:
LORENCE F. SMITH, II
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI Bennettsville
Wilson v. Supervising Officer, et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Defendant:
Creally CO II, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN, ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT, BENJAMIN DAVID, New Hanover County District Attorney, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Carter v. Hively
as 2:2024cv00273
Defendant:
Herbert L. Hively, II
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
