Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Satterfield v. City of Chesapeake Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff: Wade B. Satterfield
Defendant: City of Chesapeake Police Department, Charles Horne, Jack Bider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wright v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02288
Petitioner: Harold L. Wright
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thornton vs. Clarke, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00635
Plaintiff: Antoine Jermaine Thornton
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Karen Stapleton, Edward L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Harold Wright
as 16-734
Movant: In re: HAROLD L. WRIGHT
:
Wright v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv01348
Plaintiff: James L. Wright
Defendant: Karen D. Brown, Algie T. Howell, Dr. A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. S&R Bluffton Inc et al
as 9:2015cv02189
Plaintiff: Broadcast Music Inc , Concord Music Group Inc , Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp and others
Defendant: S&R Bluffton Inc, Russell P Anderson and Shannon L Wright
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Moody v. Wright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00194
Plaintiff: Kenneth L. Moody
Defendant: Luther L. Wright, Jr., Joy Price, Kimberly Runion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31272
Plaintiff: Crystal L. Wright and Chad N. Wright
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Taylor v. Arenda Allen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2284
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee: JUDGE ARENDA L. WRIGHT ALLEN
Taylor v. Wright Allen
as 2:2014cv00576
Plaintiff: Eric Emanuel Taylor
Defendant: Arenda L. Wright Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?