Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Selective Insurance Company of America v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 7:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company, Rising, Inc. and Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pride v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04410
Plaintiff:
Glovia Pride
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pride v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02343
Plaintiff:
Meredith L. Pride
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cynthia Faye Davis et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03399
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Faye Davis , Barbara J. Adams , Terry M. Anders and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
American Pride Properties, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2016cv06811
Plaintiff:
American Pride Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service , Office of the Attorney General of the United States Civil Litigation Division and Oshel Craigo
Cross_claimant:
Oshel Craigo
Cross_defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Counter_claimant:
Oshel Craigo
Counter_defendant:
American Pride Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Pride v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02173
Petitioner:
Sherman Pride
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. John Pride, III
as 16-6655
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN PRIDE, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Walters v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 3:2016cv00724
Plaintiff:
Eric Walters
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
