Cases 41 - 50 of 130
BRASWELL v. ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2019cv00201
Petitioner:
ROBERT TARON BRASWELL
Respondent:
ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KIMBLE v. ROWAN COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIMBLE v. ROWAN COUNTY CLERK OFFICE
as 1:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant:
ROWAN COUNTY CLERK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHATHA v. GOULD et al
as 1:2018cv00698
Defendant:
ROWAN CLERK OF COURT, B. C. BENFIELD, RICHARD D. LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff:
CORY ANTOINE MAHATHA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWAN COUNTY v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00524
Plaintiff:
ROWAN COUNTY
Defendant:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
NANCE,et al v. MOODY, et al
as 1:2017cv00957
Plaintiff:
HUNTER NANCE , DONNA NANCE and RODNEY NANCE
Defendant:
LYNN MOODY , ROWAN SALISBURY BOARD OF EDUCATION , KELLY WITHERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Freddie Andaya v. J. McClaskey
as 17-7111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE ANDAYA, a/k/a Raymond Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE J. P. MCCLASKEY, DET. CITY OF CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE K. CHILDERS, DETECTIVE R. GONSALEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA, ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and CHIEF GUY SMITH
FAROOK v. ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
as 1:2017cv00738
Petitioner:
KHALIL A. FAROOK
Respondent:
ROWAN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
