Cases 41 - 50 of 12,071
William Chiles v. Domanick Smith
as 24-6354
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CHILES
Defendant:
DOMANICK D. SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, CROMER HAIGLER, MACEO WILKINS and others
Riddle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
C.J. Wilson, Mark Gouge, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03094
Plaintiff:
Bradly Mitchell Smith
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Timothy R. Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Loudoun County School Board et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Tonya Smith
Defendant:
Loudoun County School Board and Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Servonte Rhamone Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2024cv01810
Plaintiff:
Tabitha N. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
US Attorney - Social Security Noticing and Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Charles O. Shephard
Respondent:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
