Cases 51 - 60 of 9,215
Selliken v. Gresock et al
as 7:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Joseph H. Selliken
Defendant:
Lindsay Gresock and Nickolas Gresock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robert H Mahoney v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01580
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gordon v. Taylor et al
as 7:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Jenifer Gordon
Respondent:
Michael W. Taylor, Brian H. Turpin, Mary Kathryn Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. CONLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
MARY H JOHNSON, MD
Defendant:
AZZIE CONLEY, LINDA SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Virgil H. Moore
Defendant:
Jupiter Aluminum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
