Cases 51 - 60 of 163
Wallace v. Prince George County Detention Center et al
as 1:2019cv02464
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Corizon Health Services and Prince George County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barton College v. Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
as 5:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Plaintiff:
Barton College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Prince Georges County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv01988
Plaintiff:
Erico Brown and Enrico Brown
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Corizon Health Services, Prince Georges County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sherlock v. Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 5:2019cv01633
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and Aramark
Plaintiff:
Michael William Sherlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb v. Cameron et al
as 8:2019cv00645
Defendant:
Michael R. Merican, Wendy, Kristy and others
Plaintiff:
Dyron S Newcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aramark Services, Inc. et al v. Salami et al
as 8:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Organizational Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Funke Salami
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Perry v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 7:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Helen Perry
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Smart v. The Dept. of Corrections for Queens Anne County et al
as 8:2017cv03606
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin F Smart
Defendant:
The Dept. of Corrections for Queens Anne County, Aramark Inc, Mears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
