Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Barrow et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05069
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Barrow and Bobby Barrow
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00150
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00035
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Barrow v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Barrow
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barrow v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv03393
Plaintiff:
Peggy Barrow
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barrow v. Russell et al
as 7:2011cv00341
Defendant:
Major Allen, M. Fields, Sargent F. Hubbard and others
Plaintiff:
Allan Anthony Barrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Trantham, Jr. v. Henry County Sheriff's Office
as 11-1337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD TRANTHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, County of Henry, GARDNER GARDNER BARROW & SHARPE and others
Trantham v. Henry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney (County of Henry), Drug Enforcement Agency, Gardner Gardner Barrow & Sharpe and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Trantham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
US v. Daryl Barrow
as 10-4840
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARYL SCOTT BARROW
Todd et al v. Ford Motor Co Inc
as 3:2010cv00787
Plaintiff:
Marvin J Todd and Carolyn Diane Todd
Defendant:
Ford Motor Co Inc and Ford Motor Co
Trustee:
Mark Steven Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
