Cases 51 - 60 of 1,705
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
US v. Clarence Graham
as 23-4771
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLARENCE JAMAR GRAHAM
Tito Knox v. Officer Graham
as 23-7177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER GRAHAM, JOE BIDEN, S. RICE and others
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-2219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Jacques v. Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee et al
as 7:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee, A.W. Waughan, Lt. D. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GRAHAM v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
BRENDA GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jack Graham, III v. Steve Albro
as 23-2064
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACK H. GRAHAM, III, d/b/a Kathye's Jewelry and Pawn Shop
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE ALBRO, Director of Industry Operations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv05934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
