Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Colin Andrew v. Matt Lohr
as 11-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLIN ANDREW
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT LOHR, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, THOMAS MOOREHEAD, President, Sterling BMW, SALLY WOODSON SPIGLE, President, Rick Woodson Honda and others
Gilmer v. Ashan et al
as 7:2010cv00527
Defendant:
Dr. Ashan, Nurse Harper, QMPH Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Vince Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. Blank et al
as 3:2010cv00353
Plaintiff:
Colin Andrew
Defendant:
Jonathan Blank, Tom Haymore, Lynn Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akins v. USA-2255
as 1:2010cv00927
Petitioner:
Vince Akins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00226
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
DEPALMA v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
VINCE JAMES DEPALMA
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, GUILFORD COUNTY, CITY OF HIGH POINT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allison v. Scoggins et al
as 1:2009cv00468
Plaintiff:
William I Allison and William I Allison
Defendant:
Vince Scoggins, James J Bombenger and Shelby Emergency Associates, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Gilmer v. Rooker
as 7:2008cv00635
Plaintiff:
Vince Gilmer
Defendant:
Rooker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilmer v. Ofogh et al
as 7:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Vince Gilmer
Defendant:
Dr. Ofogh and Fore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Louis v. Martinez et al
as 5:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
Gerard N. Louis
Defendant:
Ricardo Martinez, Chris Griner and Vince Clements
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
