Cases 61 - 70 of 168
Forbes v. Clarke
as 1:2018cv00158
Petitioner:
Christopher Forbes
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forbes v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Irma Fay Forbes
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Frederick Banks v. Kelly Forbes
as 17-7207
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY FORBES, FMC Butner, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, MARK HORNAK and others
Gardner v. Kanawha County, West Virginia et al
as 2:2017cv03934
Defendant:
John J. Frail , Kanawha County, West Virginia , Kanawha County Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie C Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 5:2017hc02102
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshal's Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Forbes
as 1:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
George Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
Shiheed v. Barnette et al
as 1:2017cv01047
Plaintiff:
Yahyi Abdul Shiheed
Defendant:
Barnette, E. Lyle and Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Brat v. Gloria Personhuballah
as 17-1389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLORIA PERSONHUBALLAH, an individual and JAMES FARKAS, an individual
Plaintiff:
DAWN CURRY PAGE, an individual
Defendant:
JAMES B. ALCORN, CLARA BELLE WHEELER, SINGLETON B. MCALLISTER and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
ERIC CANTOR, Congressman and FRANK WOLF, Congressman
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BRAT, BARBARA COMSTOCK, ROBERT WITTMAN, Congressman and others
:
, , and others
Forbes v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01740
Plaintiff:
Darla Forbes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
