Cases 61 - 70 of 413
Barrett v. Davis et al
as 5:2021cv01763
Defendant:
Lt Davis, Capt Witherspoon, Capt McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pichai et al
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeremy Defour v. Sadler
as 21-6443
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, Health Services Authority, 3 DOCTORS, (Names Unknown) Not Provided, MS. BURKHEAD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. BROOKS and SADLER, Health Services Authority
US v. Joshua Sutherland
as 21-6203
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA BARRETT SUTHERLAND, a/k/a Bacon
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Swain v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2021ct03045
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Sgt. Barrett, Lt. Gay and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Joshua Sutherland
as 21-6193
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA BARRETT SUTHERLAND, a/k/a Bacon
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raoul Lafond v. Richard Glaser, Jr.
as 21-6177
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., LYNNE P. KLAUER, WALTER C. HOLTON, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAOUL LAFOND
Barrett v. PAE Incorporated
as 1:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Kerrin Barrett
Defendant:
PAE Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Moussa Haba v. Sheriff Beth Arthur
as 20-7813
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT HAYES, S922, DEPUTY WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN TERNENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOUSSA MOISE HABA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
