Cases 61 - 70 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Welch et al v. Sixt Franchise USA LLC et al
as 6:2016cv01553
Plaintiff:
Ken Welch , East Coast Car Rental LLC , William Burch and others
Defendant:
Sixt Franchise USA LLC, Sixt Rent A Car LLC, Sixt Financial Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Liewald v. Lieber CI et al
as 8:2016cv00859
Plaintiff:
Clifton Daryl Ray Liewald
Defendant:
Warden McFadden, A Warden Blackwell, Capt Brightharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burch v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01963
Plaintiff:
Beverly P. Burch
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyler v. Byrd et al
as 4:2016cv00400
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
Wayne Byrd, Paul M Burch, James Bogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Bogle et al
as 4:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
James Bogle , Sr, Paul M Burch and James K Falk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver:
Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Raoul Lafond
as 15-7456
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAOUL LAFOND, a/k/a Chris Lafond, a/k/a Jim, a/k/a Jamaican Jim, a/k/a Derrick Burch, a/k/a Fletcher Busbee, a/k/a Ronald Elie, a/k/a Ronald Ely
Burch v. Seterus, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
Steven Burch
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
S.B. et al v. Forest Research Institute, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv09308
Plaintiff:
S.B. and Kathleen Burch
Defendant:
Forest Research Institute, Inc. , Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
