Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Gravely v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2013cv04209
Plaintiff:
Richard Gravely
Defendant:
City of Charleston , City of Charleston Police Department, Christopher St. Claire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kindley et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06443
Plaintiff:
Connie Kindley and Dempsey Kindley
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04510
Plaintiff:
Juanita Smith and Dempsey Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas Dempsey, III v. Warden Willie Eagleton
as 13-6104
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS DEMPSEY, III
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIE L. EAGLETON
Kahl v. Eloqua, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bradley Christopher Kahl
Defendant:
Eloqua, Inc., Joseph P. Payne, Neal Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jerry McIntyre v. Horry County
as 12-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY DEMPSEY MCINTYRE
Defendant - Appellee:
HORRY COUNTY, South Carolina, PHILLIP THOMPSON, Sheriff and J. M. SIMMONS, SCHP
Dempsey v. SEAIR Transport Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01413
Plaintiff:
David B. Dempsey
Defendant:
SEAIR Transport Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dempsey v. Eagleton
as 0:2012cv03254
Petitioner:
Douglas Dempsey, III
Respondent:
Willie Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03201
Plaintiff:
Dempsey Washington
Defendant:
United States of America, D. Carpenter, Warden of Cumberland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
