Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 407
Gill v. United States of America, The
as 4:2022cv01585
Plaintiff: Shannon C.M. Gill
Defendant: United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sterling Singleton v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-6571
Plaintiff / Appellant: STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee: BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, DENNIS PATTERSON, Director of Operations, WILLIE DAVIS, Regional Director and others
In re: Raymond Gill
as 22-175
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
GILL v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff: HENRY ANTOINE GILL
Defendant: SENECA EARL WRIGHT and SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1446
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Gill v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02073
Petitioner: Kenneth F. Gill
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Bahus et al
as 8:2022cv00897
Plaintiff: Christian B Thomas
Defendant: Alexander Bahus, Laura H.G. O'Sulivan, HSBC USA Stan Moskowitz, CFO doing business as PHH Mortgage Services and others
Kidwell v. Moultrie et al
as 8:2022cv00818
Defendant: Carrie M Ward, Robin D. Bright, Brandon Moultrie and others
Plaintiff: Patra Kidwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
US v. Raymond Gill
as 22-6357
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Singleton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00940
Plaintiff: Sterling L Singleton
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?