Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Jones v. Hammond et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Waburn Jones
Defendant:
Catherine C. Hammond, Toni M. Randall and G. Russell Stone, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: David Barren
as 14-1031
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID BARREN, a/k/a James Willie Jones, a/k/a Vincent Hutchins
:
Jones et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv28515
Plaintiff:
Jill Jones and James Rayford Jones, III
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. James Albert Jone
as 13-6955
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ALBERT JONES
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07161
Plaintiff:
Julie K. Jones and James R. Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v McCall
as 6:2013cv00749
Petitioner:
James Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Consolidation Coal Company
as 1:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
James D. Jones, II , Timothy E. Jones and Janet L. Jones
Defendant:
Consolidation Coal Company and Consol Energy, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Consolidation Coal Company
Counter_defendant:
James D. Jones, II , Janet L. Jones and Timothy E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Jones v. Owen et al
as 8:2012cv03018
Plaintiff:
James B Jones
Defendant:
John Owen, A W Langford, NFN Birchler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Jones et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06005
Plaintiff:
Cindy Sing Jones and James E. Jones
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. USA
as 1:2012cv00838
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES BERNARD JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
