Cases 61 - 70 of 179
David Meyers v. Jeffrey Kiser
as 19-6187
Defendant / Appellee:
FISCAL TECH, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Laduca v. Hampton County et al
as 9:2018cv03281
Defendant:
Hampton County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Officers of the Hampton County Detention Center and Hampton County
Plaintiff:
Michael S Laduca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Horne v. Coakley et al
as 2:2018cv00119
Defendant:
Warden Joseph Coakley, 6 Unknown Officers, Corrections Officer Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horne v. Corrections Officer Barber et al
as 5:2018cv00172
Defendant:
6 "Unknown Officers", Corrections Officer Barber, Lt. B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meyers v. Counts et al
as 7:2018cv00502
Defendant:
M.L. Counts, Kieth Dawkins, J. Fannin and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Kiser et al
as 7:2018cv00485
Defendant:
R. Ballou, Glen Conrad, C. Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Binkley et al
as 0:2018cv01416
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Binkley and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Perry v. Michael Paris
as 18-1394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PARIS, Regional Jail Facility Contractor of the same, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, and unknown officers, agents and employees of the same, ROGERS and others
Burgess v. Mathis et al
as 7:2017cv03343
Plaintiff:
Deon Jermaine Burgess
Defendant:
Brendall K Mathis, Unknown Officers and Direct Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
