Cases 71 - 80 of 81
US v. Michael William
as 10-4288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Williams v. Omega Laboratories Inc
as 7:2009cv01960
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams and Michael Williams
Defendant:
Omega Laboratories Inc and Omega Laboratories Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Williams
as 1:2009cv00512
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
THE OHIO CASUALTY INS. CO. v. WILLIAMS, et al
as 1:2009cv00513
Plaintiff:
THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, SURETY
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS and ANGELIQUE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Broderick v. Roanoke County Salem City Jail et al
as 7:2009cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michael William Broderick
Defendant:
Roanoke County Salem City Jail, Kaiser, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BARBER et al v. CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
as 1:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARBER, WILLIAM BELLAMY, CHARLES BOWDEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Michael Gabbard
as 09-4235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM GABBARD
Williams v. CRC Industries Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00327
Plaintiff:
William Michael Williams and William Michael Williams
Defendant:
CRC Industries Inc, Ritz Camera Centers Inc, Ritz Camera Centers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Westbrook v. Bazzle et al
as 9:2008cv03926
Plaintiff:
Stephen Westbrook
Defendant:
Richard Bazzle, Stephen Claytor, NFN Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
