Cases 81 - 90 of 7,331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Truist Bank v. 4420 North Fairfax LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank f/k/a Branch Banking and Trust Company, Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
4420 North Fairfax LLC and Peter C. Minshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, M. SPENCER, GLASSCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruno F Gargiulo v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Bruno F Gargiulo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Ng
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson, Katherine Nolan, Dale F. Stepka and others
Defendant:
Kathy Kar Po Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Nicoll v. Bergey, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Nancy F Nicoll
Defendant:
James Bergey, Jr. and Charles H Shorley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
