Cases 81 - 90 of 2,131
Wyche v. Hupp et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jaquelle Wyche
Defendant:
Drayke Hupp, Heather Mounie and Captain Lucy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richey v. McBride et al
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jerry Richey
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad McBride, Captain David Baker, Lieutenant Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoudemire v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Hazel Stoudemire, SR
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas, Lieutant Priester, Captain Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Donald Ames
as 23-7291
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD F. AMES, Warden, JASON BRAGG, Unit Manager, RICHARD TONEY, Captain and others
Lester v. Yawn et al
as 5:2023ct03348
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
Colleen Yawn, Tana Dillard-Hill, William M. Mouring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Chaplain R. Adams, Lt. R. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweat v. Bright Heart et al
as 2:2023cv06419
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Defendant:
Bright Heart, Pipins and Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick Gil v. Jane Doe
as 23-7244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK NILO GIL
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, C.O. 1, LT. FOWLKES, SGT. WARD and others
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
