Cases 81 - 90 of 159
US v. Veronica Dew
as 15-2063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VERONICA W. DEW
Defendant:
JAMES CHAPPELL DEW, a/k/a J. Chappell Dew, Jr., a/k/a James Chappell Dew, Jr., a/k/a James C. Dew, Jr. and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Chappell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13016
Plaintiff:
Amy Chappell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Ragland et al
as 4:2015cv03472
Plaintiff:
Gary Lavon Robinson
Defendant:
Thomas Ragland, Nikon Morgan, Christopher Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Chappell v. International Brotherhood
as 15-1980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK CHAPPELL
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local Union 772 and SCOTT FULMER
Chappell v. Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County
as 8:2015cv01986
Defendant:
Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County
Plaintiff:
Albert A. Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freddie Riley v. Ed McMahon
as 15-6934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE LEE RILEY
Movant:
JACQUES CHAVIS, RICK EDWARD TOSCANO and JOEL WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF ED MCMAHON, DR. STUBBS and OFFICER CHAPPELL
Rivera v. Stirling et al
as 8:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Syncere Rivera
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Mr McKie and Mr Chappel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Chappelle v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv04533
Plaintiff:
Tony Chappelle
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Lt Jefferson , Sgt Stinett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
