Cases 81 - 90 of 176
Carawan v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
William Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell, FNU Miller, FNU McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton State Bank v. Tillman
as 1:2015cv01329
Plaintiff:
Hamilton State Bank
Defendant:
Barbara Tillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillman v. South Carolina
as 6:2015cv03114
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Ann Tillman
Respondent:
Warden of Leath Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tillman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09982
Plaintiff:
Diane Tillman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillman et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv02682
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Tillman and Sandra E Tillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08547
Plaintiff:
Sebrena Tillman and Reginald Tillman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rankin Bey v. Quintero et al
as 1:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
FNU Quintero, FNU Tillman, FNU Watson and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin Bey v. Quintero et al
as 5:2015ct03115
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Quintero, Capt. Tillman, Lt. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Holt v. Susan Stroman
as 15-1377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT B. HOLT, individually and DORIS HOLT, Estate of Doris Holt by and through Robert B. Holt, sole beneficiary
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN STROMAN, PRINCESS HODGES, SUSAN TILLMAN and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, BRENDA B. HUGHES, individually and in her official capacity as Administrator with UniHealth and others
US v. James Tillman
as 14-7902
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES TILLMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
