Cases 81 - 90 of 1,924
Woods v. SC Department of Social Services
as 6:2023cv04812
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
SC Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WOOD v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
DAVID RYAN WOOD
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, THE COUNTY OF ROWAN, J. TRAVIS ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
FELTON WOODS
Defendant:
FANTASIA EDMONDS, ATTORNEY JANE DOE, Ms. STEPHANIE REAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Woods v. Marshak et al
as 3:2023cv04472
Plaintiff:
Terry Woods
Defendant:
Larry Marshak and Florida Entertainment Management Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Falcon Owens v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FALCON OWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Ryan Francisco v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN FRANCISCO
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
David Eakle v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EAKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Wood v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv04310
Plaintiff:
Earl Clinton Wood, IV
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Woods Cross City v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04235
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Woods Cross City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Woods
as 3:2023cv00529
Petitioner:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
