Cases 1 - 10 of 1,757
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Charles Andre Bailey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Muhammad v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Tracy Carroll, Officer Hall, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
BRITT v. GREGG et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DESEIRAY BRITT
Defendant:
KATHRYN LEBAUBE GREGG, CHRISTOPHER BAILEY, GREGORY BOONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheless v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Rachel Tillery Wheless
Defendant:
Jud Lee Bailey and Tryon Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ridgley et al v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant:
Warden and William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
