Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mohammad Salami v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 20-1838
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD REZA SALAMI, PH.D., M.D.
Mohammad Salami v. US DHS Office
as 20-6175
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE, GREENSBORO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD REZA SALAMI, PH.D, M.D.
SALAMI v. AMERIPRISE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE
as 1:2019cv00371
Plaintiff:
FATEMEH B. SALAMI
Defendant:
AMERIPRISE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Aramark Services, Inc. et al v. Salami et al
as 8:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Organizational Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Funke Salami
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
SALAMI, PH.D., M.D. v. US DHS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00977
Defendant:
NC ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and US DHS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Plaintiff:
M. REZA SALAMI, PH.D., M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SALAMI, PH.D., M.D. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE, N.A.
as 1:2018cv00794
Plaintiff:
M. REZA SALAMI, PH.D., M.D.
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAMI v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2018cv00765
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
M. REZA SALAMI, PH.D., M.D.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Ponson v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2012cv01683
Plaintiff:
Alvin Ponson, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services , Corizon Medical Services , Bon Secours Baltimore Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
