Cases 1 - 10 of 93
INGLE v. SHORT et al
as 1:2026cv00941
Plaintiff:
CANDACE ALANA INGLE
Defendant:
TINA HAWKY SHORT and JAMES COLBY NEWSOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGLE v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2026cv00828
Plaintiff:
CANDACE INGLE and CANDACE ALANA INGLE
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SPENCER HOLLOMAN and GUILFORD COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
Alana M. Karnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ingle v. Guilford County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2026ct03247
Plaintiff:
Candace Ingle and Candace Alana Ingle
Defendant:
Guilford County Sheriff's Department, Spencer Holloman and Guilford County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02434
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Crosby v. Rutland
as 2:2026cv02836
Plaintiff:
Keri Alana Crosby
Defendant:
Jennifer Robair Rutland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Prince
as 3:2026cv00085
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alana Rae Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reavis v. Abejuela et al
as 1:2026cv00886
Plaintiff:
Omar Cyrille Reavis
Defendant:
Maha Rebekah Abejuela, Stephanie J. Smith, Alana Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
