Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Monroe, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
State Farm Fire And Casualty Company v. Zdyb
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Defendant:
Lisa Diane Zdyb, Administrator of the Estate of Arthur Lee Zdyb, Deceased and Lisa Diane Zdyb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC
GIVENS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS
Defendant:
DR. (FNU) COLLINS, CAPTAIN (FNU) INGRAM, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIVENS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE GIVENS
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and GANG MEMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Hales et al
as 5:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Meeks
Defendant:
Christopher Hales, Town of Cameron and Cameron, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 22-2169
Petitioner:
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.
Respondent:
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 22-2038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
