Cases 1 - 10 of 16
NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY v. CUSTOM SHEETMETAL SERVICES, INC., et al
as 1:2021cv00657
Plaintiff:
NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CUSTOM SHEETMETAL SERVICES, INC., THE VIRGINIA B. LEE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JOSEPH M. LEE, III and others
Hill v. McNulty et al
as 1:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Paul J. McNulty, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Karen B. Lee and Howard W. Lee
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30645
Plaintiff:
Christine Lee and Mark B. Lee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Chandler et al
as 4:2013cv02010
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Alan K Chandler, Marion B Lee, Jr, Jim M Cherry, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lee v. Mack et al
as 1:2012cv03639
Plaintiff:
Rievon B. Lee
Defendant:
Stephen Mack, D.O.C. Hearing Officer and Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09813
Plaintiff:
Linda B. Lee
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Amsted Rail Company, Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2011cv02534
Petitioner:
Rievon B. Lee
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hundley v. Watson et al
as 1:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
James Jay Hundley
Defendant:
Bryan Watson and B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Abercrombie et al
as 5:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Norris Foster , Noah Alpern and Louis Alpern
Defendant:
George B. Abercrombie , Adrian Adams , Kip A. Frey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
