Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Boyd v. United States Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv04236
Plaintiff:
Latasha Boyd and Latasha Monique Boyd
Defendant:
United States Corporation, Spartanburg Municipalities Corporation, Spartanburg Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
STRATTON v. CITY OF KANNAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
KATHY STRATTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, J. M. LIVENGOOD, M. T. HOEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bagwell et al v. Gammill Inc et al
as 8:2019cv03080
Plaintiff:
Cameron Crow Bagwell and Corey Darren Bagwell
Defendant:
Gammill Inc and Jearld Ray Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laidler et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2019cv02926
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Transportation, Thomas Construction, Kevin Scott Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Laidler and Linda Laidler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Susan Matousek v. Keffer Realty
as 19-1188
Defendant / Appellee:
RON RUNNELLS, WESLEY RONALD BAGWELL, CHRIS MILLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN NEAL MATOUSEK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
